Search for: "J F
v.
Review Board"
Results 461 - 480
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
1 May 2018, 3:36 pm
Shinseki, 580 F.3d 1288 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House of Representatives, 3 March (Anticipate This!) [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm
Mar. 23, 2023) (Stras, J., concurring). [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:31 pm
As Wilson J. pointed out, in dissent, the mandatory retirement policy was enacted by the university’s Board pursuant to s. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:27 am
The three justices who first advocated the change, "Saylor, J., joined by Castille, J. and Eakin, J. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Shah and Daniel F. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
United Kingdom (1980), 3 E.H.R.R. 408 (Comm.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:55 am
John’s Law StudentAmerican Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Staff Recently, in Dumont v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:39 pm
SEC, 23 F. 3d 452, 462–465 (CADC 1994)(Silberman, J.) [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
In order to assure that such acquisitions will not deter unsolicited tender offers, the structural argument would require searching judicial review of the board’s motives in any negotiated acquisition. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 691 (1988); id. at 705-706 (Scalia, J., concurring).[10] Constraining the Attorney General’s selection and appointment of prosecutors interferes with this quintessentially executive function and deprives the Attorney General of the counsel of his choice. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
By Jeffrey J. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
The venue is the Shailesh J. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” Judge J. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Ted J. [read post]
