Search for: "J. A. Jones" Results 461 - 480 of 2,793
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Zetzsche (University of Luxembourg), on Thursday, May 20, 2021 Tags: Banks, Blockchain, Cross-border transactions, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial technology, International governance, Securities regulation 2021 Proxy Season Issues and Early Voting Trends Posted by James J. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jones v Stooshinoff (Nicholas J. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm by John Floyd
”     Strange Irony of Justice Failing to Acknowledge Immaturity of Juveniles   Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh was appointed to the Supreme Court by former President Donald J. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm by Jamie Markham
’” Jones, slip op. at 9 (Sotomayor, J., dissenting). [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:51 am
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System Posted by Jason Halper, Matthew Karlan, and Nicholas Caros, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, on Monday, April 12, 2021 Tags: Basic, Class actions, Fraud-on-the-Market, Reliance, Rule 10b-5, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Supreme Court Executive Pay and ESG Performance Posted by Tom Gosling, London Business School, and Phillippa O’Connor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, on Monday, April 12, 2021… [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Ho, and four of his colleague, dissented from the denial of rehearing en banc: Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, and Duncan. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
  Arag Plc v Jones & Anor (2020) EWHC 3484 (Comm) Mr Jones and Ms Gibson had brought a disrepair claim against their landlord Mr Francis. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
As a drug lawyer in Minnesota, the phrase, “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure,” comes to mind frequently. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Aila Hoss
Last September, former President Donald J. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:27 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Feb. 8, 2021 Jones, J.), the court ruled that there is no coverage due under an all-risk policy given that there was no “direct physical loss of or damage to property” as a result of the COVID-19 related closure of a restaurant. [read post]