Search for: "J. W."
Results 461 - 480
of 8,743
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Harding and William J. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Smith & Robert W. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
[So the California Court of Appeal has held, concluding that there is enough of a factual dispute (under California's plaintiff-friendly pleading standards) for the case to go forward.] [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:49 pm
Unless otherwise mentioned, photos were taken by J. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
My students Pareesa Darafshi, Gerardo Valentino Gorospe IV, and Philip Raucci and I just submitted this brief on behalf of the Academic Freedom Alliance in Pernell & Novoa v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
Because it was a fiscal session, the Louisiana Legislature enacted a number of key tax changes in the 2023 Regular Session that concluded on June 8, 2023. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
June 9, 2023 Nealon, J.), the court addressed the proper breadth and scope of subpoenas for a Plaintiff’s prior medical records in a medical malpractice action.In this case, the Plaintiffs confirmed to the court that they had no objection to the Defendants seeking records regarding the injured Plaintiff’s condition at issue. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The classical utility social welfare function can be represented as follows: W(x)=U1(x) + U2(x) + U(3(x) . . . [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
Tim W. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
Justice Sotomayor expressed reluctance stating “I have some hesitation doing away with the Rogers test” which protects First Amendment rights.[9] The Supreme Court’s June 8, 2023 Unanimous Decision In its opinion, the Supreme Court stated that the Court initially needed to decide whether “the company [should] have had to satisfy the Rogers threshold test before the case could proceed to the Lanham Act’s likelihood-of-confusion inquiry” and noted that the… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
Justice Sotomayor expressed reluctance stating “I have some hesitation doing away with the Rogers test” which protects First Amendment rights.[9] The Supreme Court’s June 8, 2023 Unanimous Decision In its opinion, the Supreme Court stated that the Court initially needed to decide whether “the company [should] have had to satisfy the Rogers threshold test before the case could proceed to the Lanham Act’s likelihood-of-confusion inquiry” and noted that the… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
Justice Sotomayor expressed reluctance stating “I have some hesitation doing away with the Rogers test” which protects First Amendment rights.[9] The Supreme Court’s June 8, 2023 Unanimous Decision In its opinion, the Supreme Court stated that the Court initially needed to decide whether “the company [should] have had to satisfy the Rogers threshold test before the case could proceed to the Lanham Act’s likelihood-of-confusion inquiry” and noted that the… [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
W. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:14 am
W. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
HHS Departmental Appeals Board (DAB) Appeals (June 15, 2023): The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is enormous, employing more than 80,000 individuals[1] who work in a dozen operating divisions and an even greater number of independent offices that report directly to the Office of the Secretary.[2] One of these independent offices is the HHS Departmental Appeals Board (DAB or Board). [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
Harding and William J. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
According to former President George W. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
J. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
”[3] The question presented before the Supreme Court is “[w]hether the refusal to register a mark under Section 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
