Search for: "JOHN DOE, official and individual" Results 461 - 480 of 3,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm by Bill Marler
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:28 am by Eugene Volokh
(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.) [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm by Ilya Somin
Section 1373, a controversial federal law mandating that "a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 8:03 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
[Blogger's note:  Today's guest column is by my colleague at Seyfarth Shaw, John Quill. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
The lack of resources that would allow individuals to live in a hospitable environment may force an individual to elect end of life treatment. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
This does not just include the well-publicised incidents involving Premier League superstars. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 3:34 am
Each attorney represented anywhere from one to 14 sex offenders known publicly as John Does 1 through 30, and four more lawyers represented the defendants -- state, county and municipal officials.The John Does have sued the state, district attorneys, sheriffs and police chiefs, seeking to remain relatively anonymous. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm by Steven Schwinn
Schwinn is an Associate Professor of Law at The John Marshall Law School in Chicago. [read post]
24 May 2008, 3:13 am
A federal judge in Kansas City subsequently banned John Doe I from future executions. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 11:41 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
“Federal criminal liability,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the high court’s majority in Elonis, “does not turn solely on the results of an act without considering the defendant’s mental state. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
If individuals have no reason to expect privacy against civilian surveillance of a particular sort—being looked at on the street, for example—then they similarly have no constitutionally protected basis for expecting privacy against the same kind of surveillance by law enforcement officials. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 4:39 am by SHG
Despite having “considered carefully the fact that John Doe and Mary Smith admitted that they had engaged in consensual sexual intercourse before the two evenings at issue,” he made a “careful assessment” to conclude that John was nonetheless guilty—because John was “consistently vague” and Mary provided “specific details. [read post]