Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC" Results 461 - 480 of 887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  One-time relist Pitcairn Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Hobby Lobby, Inc., 723 F. 3d 1114 (10th Cir., 2013) provides one of the most interesting applications of the insights we try to draw in the book. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
Home Capital, Inc., 13-705, and Takushi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
The petitioners in the patent-infringement case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by John Elwood
  Patent-infringement case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 6:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
    When carrying out these activities, most covered entities and business associates also will want to take steps to monitor potential responsibilities and exposures under other federal and state laws like the privacy and data security requirements that often apply to personal financial information, trade secrets or other sensitive data under applicable federal and state laws and judicial precedent. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
  The last new arrival to Relist Watch this week is Jennings v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:19 am by WSLL
Easton.Representing Appellee Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.: Steven L. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:06 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
    When carrying out these activities, most covered entities and business associates also will want to take steps to monitor potential responsibilities and exposures under other federal and state laws like the privacy and data security requirements that often apply to personal financial information, trade secrets or other sensitive data under applicable federal and state laws and judicial precedent. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:03 am by Glenn
HTC America, Inc., the Western District of Washington held that the putative class members had not sufficiently plead injury to have standing. [read post]