Search for: "Jackson v. Doe" Results 461 - 480 of 3,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
Judge Jackson further noted that NARA was powerless to classify the records as presidential: “the PRA does not confer any mandatory or even discretionary authority on the Archivist to classify records. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm by Evan Lee
  “We express no position on the Government’s view of double jeopardy, because even assuming it, arguendo, the Government’s view does not refute our holding on the question presented,” Jackson said. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am by Marcia Coyle
On June 8, 2023, the court, in a 7-2 decision, ruled in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Lorianne Updike Toler The Supreme Court announced its decision in Haaland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
By Alec Lesseliers Introduction The British Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (MET), and the Germanisches Nationalmuseum are a few of the world’s most famous and largest history museums with objects in their collection from all over the world. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Also on Thursday, the Supreme Court decided Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:19 pm by Josh Blackman
On Thursday, the Supreme Court decided Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]