Search for: "Jane Doe #1 " Results 461 - 480 of 1,484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:21 am by Eric Goldman
Indeed, the Jane Doe decision discusses Ninth Circuit precedent without distinguishing or questioning it, including with respect to the critical prong of the inquiry here. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On April 1, 2019, Pa.R.C.P. 2005, which governs the use of “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” designations in pleadings, took effect. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:07 am by Hollis Kelly
The scandal has already led to the PM’s Liberal Party expelling Jody Wilson Raybould, the former Attorney General who made the original allegations of improper interference, and former treasury board president Jane Philpott. [read post]
1 May 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
However, it does not allow users to flag content as "criminal" or "illegal" and does not take action to delete illegal content. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:39 am by Aaron Rubin and Charles Cartagena-Ortiz
The court rejected this argument, reasoning that claims based on the “structure and operation” of an interactive computer service were barred by Section 230 because the lack of safety features reflects “choices about what content can appear on the website and in what form, which are editorial choices,” citing the First Circuit’s decision in Jane Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Mark Astarita
  Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million.The SEC protects the confidentiality of whistleblowers and does not disclose information that could reveal a whistleblower’s identity as required by the Dodd-Frank Act.For more information about the whistleblower program and how to report a tip, visit www.sec.gov/whistleblower.SEC Press Release--- If you believe need help with a securities… [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:06 pm by Coral Beach
Salmonella information for consumersFood that is contaminated with Salmonella bacteria usually does not look, smell or taste spoiled. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Lev Sugarman
.), Suzanne Spaulding, Evan Wolff and moderator Jane Harman. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:21 am
"... a federal judge ruled Thursday," The Miami Herald Reports:“The government aligned themselves with Epstein, working against his victims, for 11 years,’’ [said Brad Edwards, who represents Courtney Wild — Jane Doe No. 1 in the case]. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:29 am by Paul Cassell
Between 1999 and 2007, Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls, including my clients, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 4:18 pm
The recitals from the Deed of Gift are as follows: 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The vast majority of charges (85%) are brought for bestiality, with only 1%  brought for rape pornography. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
  As regular Kat readers will know, the appeal concerns the English court's jurisdiction to grant a global FRAND licence where UK sales only account for 1% or less of the sales on which royalties are claimed. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Jane Doe 2, 18-677, and Trump v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
In a recent paper, Professor Jane Bambauer of the University of Arizona James E. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In “Jane Doe” v Sharma  2018 NY Slip Op 28386  Decided on December 1, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County  Judge Brown navigates a very unusual medical malpractice case which has several shocking details. [read post]