Search for: "Jean v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
  ["A recent case worth noting is University of Southern California v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:28 am by John L. Welch
LFC Corporate Services, Inc., Opposition No. 91181109 [Section 2(d) opposition to LFC, LFC.COM, and LFC ONLINE for various real estate services, in view of several LF marks for real estate services].May 25, 2010 - 2 PM: In re DG Fastchannel, Inc. , Serial No. 77136602 [Section 2(d) refusal of HD NOW for "Broadcasting services, namely, transmission of video advertising media and metadata via proprietary media management systems" [HD disclaimed], in view of the stylized mark HD NOW shown… [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:21 am by Venkat
In a previous case, Bank (or someone who shares his name, including his middle initial) tried to assert a section 1983 claim in federal court based on a state court judge's denial of his request to wear jeans and a hat in court: "Lawyer Has No First Amendment Right to Wear Hat in Court, Federal Judge Decides. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim must be pleaded with particularity and allege “intentional deceit and damages proximately caused by the deceit” (Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [2018]). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In the 6-3 majority decision, Justice Lewis Powell said Massachusetts couldn’t jail a man for wearing small cloth version of the United States flag sewn to the seat of his jeans. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Groupe Jean Coutu (PJC) inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:02 am by Rick St. Hilaire
But the government's lawyers contend that the claimant's reading of the law is wrong, citing in part the federal district court case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Twenty Year Anniversary of Employment Division v. [read post]