Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 461 - 480 of 637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 8:59 am by Steve Hall
Concern that prisoners were being tortured to death was at the heart of the landmark 2008 Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:58 pm by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
Superior Court (review granted Oct. 22, 2008 (Brinker) and Brinkley v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
’ ” Stevens’ thoughts no doubt reminded some observers of his dissent in the 1989 case, Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:12 pm by randal shaheen
In the underlying case, the district court found that Mead Johnson’s direct-to-consumer “mailer” falsely claimed that Mead’s brand name product, Enfamil, had superior nutritional benefits over PBM Products, which makes a less expensive “generic” store-brand infant formula (sold to Walmart, Target, Kroger and other major retailers). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:07 am by Russ Bensing
The biggest was the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:04 am by axd10
Superior Court held surrogacy contracts unenforceable • Against public policy • Custody given according to best interests of child • Resulted in shared parenting plan between intended parents and surrogate Johnson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 am by Curt Cutting
Johnson & Johnson has filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court in Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am by Brian A. Comer
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
This is an update to the post below in which I provided an article about the beginning of the South Carolina Attorney General's lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson about the drug Risperdal. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm
Resource: Johnson and Johnson v Superior Court, Court of Appeal Second District, January 20, 2011 [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am by INFORRM
 In the case of Gatelli v Pilchesky the Pennsylvia Superior Court backed online commenters’ right to anonymity, overturning an order requiring a Web site operator to disclose the identities of commenters who slammed a local politician. [read post]