Search for: "Jonathan Bench" Results 461 - 480 of 725
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico; at the National Review’s Bench Memos, where Carrie Severino weighs in on the oral argument; from LeRoy Goldman, who discusses the political implications of the Court’s ruling in the Asheville Citizen-Times; and from Jonathan Cohn, also in The Huffington Post, who contends that, “[t]o find a case in modern history that produced a similarly widespread, immediate impact, you . . . probably have to go back to Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
Briefly: The op-ed on recusal and the health care cases by former federal judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey (which Joshua covered yesterday) generated responses from Jonathan Adler at the Volokh Conspiracy and Carrie Severino at the National Review Online’s Bench Memos. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
The study's co-authors, Shai Danzinger and Jonathan Levav, managed to rule out a number of alternative hypotheses. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Simon Lazarus at The New Republic, Justin Pidot at ACSblog, Michael Bobelian of Forbes, Lisa Soronen at the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Doug Kendall and Mei-Wah Lee at Grist, Jonathan Keim at the National Review Online’s Bench Memos blog, and the editorial boards of the Tampa Bay Times, The Washington Post, The Arizona Republic, and The Baltimore Sun. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 4:27 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  There was one and only one.But Poochigian's legal background does not qualify him for the appellate bench, Wolf said, explaining:"He had not practiced law for approximately 21 years and had not litigated a case in approximately the same amount of time. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
  DISCLOSURE: As I’ve noted in prior posts on this case, I am a contributing editor at National Review Online, which means I have a fancier byline when I submit articles to them and occasionally contribute to The Corner and Bench Memos. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 10:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
For those who care about such things, Judge Bibas was among President Trump's first nominees to the federal appellate bench. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
I view these attacks as inappropriate and unfair: the judge was entitled to represent whatever clients he wished before ascending the bench, and I see no basis for believing that the judge will act in bad faith in this case or any other. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Stern does note that Judge Pryor was "one of three judges who recently ended the disruptive reign of a special master over the criminal investigation into Donald Trump," but makes no mention of all the other significant decisions by other Federalist Society-associated judges who have ruled against Trump's interests, including many whom Trump appointed to the federal bench. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This Adam Liptak interview with Tatel suggests much the same: Judge Tatel said his retirement was linked to a lesson he drew from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's decision to remain on the bench despite calls for her to step down in time to let President Barack Obama name her successor. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:08 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Respectfully, it seems to me at least reasonably possible that the crucible of adversarial testing on which we usually depend, along with the experience of our thoughtful colleagues on the district and circuit benches, could yield insights (or reveal pitfalls) we cannot muster guided only by our own lights. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Finally, as I noted in my last post on this litigation: DISCLOSURE: As I've noted in prior posts on this case, I am a contributing editor at National Review Online, which means I have a fancier byline when I submit articles to the publication and occasionally contribute to The Corner and Bench Memos. [read post]