Search for: "Jones v. No Defendants Named"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
The defendant is Chanel’s Salon LLC, a beauty salon located in Indiana and owned by someone called Chanel Jones. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:36 am
From the Complaint: “Chanel recognizes the fact that “Chanel” is the first name of Defendant Chanel Jones. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
Jones a cease and desist letter in July 2013, asking her to change the name of her salon to one not using the name Chanel, and further attempted to negotiate with Defendant before filing suit. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:10 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Rieke Corporation v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious purpose, and (v) does not… [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm
How Harm to the Class Affects Predominance: Brian Murray of Jones Day spoke about how courts are applying the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
The case in the higher court is nominally Jones v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:51 am
Jones), and in favor of the more recent "neutral principles" standard of Jones v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
The defendant did have an adult daughter from a prior relationship, whom he ultimately named as his “true and lawful attorney in fact. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
The Defendant objected arguing the report relied on inadmissible hearsay, namely statistical census data. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
The opinion is captioned with the Riley case name. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:22 pm
See Jones v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
So holds Monday’s Jones v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012). . . . [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:19 am
In Jones v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
In Jones v. [read post]
