Search for: "Justice v. Michaels et al"
Results 461 - 480
of 581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
Beyer’s article Technology’s Impact on the Changing Future of the Trusts and Estate Practice was cited in the following article: Lincoln Davies, Karrugan Bork, Sarah Krakoff, et al., Roundtable Two: Environmental Law Education: New Techniques in the Classroom and Beyond, 46 Vt. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Pope Benedict XVI, et al., a 700-year-old dispute that finally developed into a lawsuit. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat)… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
[Defense lawyer Michael] Orozco challenged Easterbrook, 61, on the merits of the decision in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:20 pm
Oral argument was heard by Justices Michael J. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Pearson, L.L.P., et al., Super. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
Department of Justice, who has broader jurisdiction (e.g. federal prosecutors can charge outsider trading as a computer crime or theft) – but no one outside of SEC staff knows for sure. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
L. 807-811 (2011).Thomas, Seth M., et al. 2009-2010 environmental law survey. 44 Ind. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
My book also features a slashing constitutional critique of the exclusionary rule, placing my views in line with — actually to the right of — Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas Alito, and opposed to the views typically championed by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer (and before them, Justices Stevens, Souter, Brennan, Marshall, et al.). [read post]
