Search for: "KEMP v. KEMP" Results 461 - 480 of 510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Willard also argued, quoting O’Connor v Coccadotts (47 Misc 3d 331 [Sup Ct, Albany County 2015]), that a bond would be entirely inappropriate without “‘proof persuasively demonstrating a need for such relief. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But with the rapid legalization of same-sex marriage in many states across the country (and potentially soon in all, depending on the outcome of the pending Supreme Court case, Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
” In Matter of Kemp & Beatley, Inc., 64 NY2d 63 (1984), in which New York’s highest court adopted the reasonable-expectations test for oppressive conduct under BCL § 1104-a, the court upheld an order granting dissolution at the behest of two shareholders, neither one of whom owned 20% of the voting shares but who together held a combined 20.33% interest. 50% Shareholder Has Standing Under § 1104-a. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Alana Sheppard
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
" But very esteemed judges have made strikingly similar observations concerning the role of race and gender in the law.O'Connor and Gender PerspectivesIn the case J.E.B. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
If you've ever studied partnerships or limited liability companies, chances are you know of Professor Larry Ribstein, the Mildred Van Voorhis Jones Chair in Law at the University of Illinois College of Law. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am by Peter Mahler
A “special solicitude toward the rights of minority shareholders of closely held corporations” was how the New York Court of Appeals in Matter of Kemp & Beatley subsequently described the legislature’s motivation for enacting section 1104-a, the implication being that common-law dissolution didn’t sufficiently protect the locked-in minority shareholder against majority abuse and overreach. [read post]