Search for: "Keen v. Keen"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
They are generally in favor of construing federal powers broadly, but are also keen on protecting individual liberty interests (with the usualexception of Justice Breyer). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
In Nielsen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:03 am
Cribbing now a little from the book's web page: This book uses the landmark case Jones v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:28 am
During his tenure he guided the organization to resounding legal victories, including Lewis v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:03 am
Among the cases in which the Court denied certiorari on today's order list is South Carolina State Ports Authority v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:53 am
Carr or Plyler v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:44 pm
Siveter v Wandsworth LBC (2012) CA (Civ Div) 16/02/2012 [Not on Bailii yet, just a Lawtel note]S was the secure tenant of Wandsworth in a 4th floor flat. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
As detailed here at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court issued just one opinion today from a case that was argued only last month, Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:44 pm
Siveter v Wandsworth LBC (2012) CA (Civ Div) 16/02/2012 [Not on Bailii yet, just a Lawtel note]S was the secure tenant of Wandsworth in a 4th floor flat. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:07 pm
But it is an endlessly fascinating time for intermediary lawyers...Anyway just a note that people seem to think that Google has won the first round, not against Viacom itself but in Tur v YouTube, an earlier launched case. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:08 pm
With the attention on Salazar v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am
[1] AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2012] EWHC 35 (Ch), per HHJ Cooke at paragraph 24 [2] Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 412 [3] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2013] EWCA Civ 45, per LJ Patten at paragraph 47 [4] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2014] UKSC 58, per Lord Toulson at paragraph 64 [5] ibid., per Lord Reed at paragraph 137 [6] Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
Let me say at the outset that I have little to no knowledge of the practical details of criminal law. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm
But there's nonetheless a serious issue about whether even commercial providers can be prevented from telling people the truth about the predictive power of their own scores.The Court of Appeal's opinion commendably reflects a keen understanding of the values at stake. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:47 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:34 am
However, the cases of Ferguson v IC(EA/2010/0085) (on which, see my post here) and Brett v IC (EA/2008/0098) imposed an important gloss on that principle. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
§ 101 has been a topic of keen interest, especially since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
It was apparent that, if the case of Medellin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:16 am
Yesterday, I paid a visit to the Supreme Court to sit in on oral argument for City of Ontario v. [read post]
