Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2021, 3:50 am
I mentioned this on the twitters and was told by a follower I respect that it went on to be inspirational, an exploration of human motivations and growth, greed v. fear v. life situations for people who had never been exposed to inhumanity. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:28 am
Kelly B., slip op. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
.] * In Kelly v Levin, 81 A.D.2d 1005, the Appellate Division held if a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, or the charged individual enters a plea of guilty, a disciplinary hearing officer need hear no other evidence to render a verdict of guilty regarding a parallel charge in an administrative disciplinary proceeding brought against that individual. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
.] * In Kelly v Levin, 81 A.D.2d 1005, the Appellate Division held if a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, or the charged individual enters a plea of guilty, a disciplinary hearing officer need hear no other evidence to render a verdict of guilty regarding a parallel charge in an administrative disciplinary proceeding brought against that individual. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
In Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
In Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:14 pm
Authors Ben Sutherland Beyond My Ken Licence CC BY-SA 2.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Zacaroli) Smith v Dryden and others [2021] EWHC 2277 (11 Aug 2021)This was a claim by Kelly-Marie Smith against Kesi Dryden and others for copyright infringement. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:34 am
Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:01 am
In Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly 2021 NY Slip Op 00833 [191 AD3d 760] February 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department, the Court writes: “Under Judiciary Law § 487 (1), an attorney who “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party” is liable to the injured party for treble damages (see Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636 [2015]; Curry… [read post]
