Search for: "Kennedy v. United States of America"
Results 461 - 480
of 521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 1:33 pm
Lang Download Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
The United States was not a defendant, nor were the military officers. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
The case is Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:46 am
Co. of America
U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
DURBIN: Well, and the one death penalty case that you handled as a district court judge, United States vs. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
United States, Apprendi v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Casey, and repeated by Justice Kennedy in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Casey, and repeated by Justice Kennedy in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
United States, 505 U.S. 144, 156159, 177 (1992). [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
Anyone interested in seeing how a very smart judge can write the equivalent of a treatise in nine pages should read Frank Easterbrook's opinion in National Rifle Association of America v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:24 am
Constitution - United States [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
A “covered jurisdiction” could be an entire state, or a county, city or other governmental unit at the local level. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:22 pm
In January, Lindsay had the privilege of arguing before the United States Supreme Court -- in her first oral argument ever. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
Madigan had to determine whether the United States was still at war in 1949. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:56 am
That wasn't enough for the State of Georgia. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
(The Violence Against Women Act of 1994, for example, was ruled in part unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]