Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 461 - 480 of 624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2010, 3:29 am by SHG
Via Doug Berman , I was schooled by the tolerant and wise Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:18 am by Jeff Gamso
  Kent Scheidegger, over at Crime & Consequences, thinks it only fair that my clients should be killed. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences Blog criticizes the article for “exaggerat[ing] the extent of the changes…. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
The court's three decisions "indicate a desire to prune back the rules somewhat," Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a victims' rights group. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:40 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences comments on a new RAND Corporation study on the issue: I was disappointed that the "alternatives" section of the report does not discuss legalization through a government-run monopoly, as "hard liquor" is presently sold... [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm by Anna Christensen
  JURIST also has coverage, while at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger noted that the case clarifies the Court’s 2007 ruling in Burton v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds with enthusiasm to the Court’s decision to “clean up one of the messier areas of its jurisprudence” in taking up the case, and he expresses hope that the Court will rule “broadly and correctly,” in his view, to narrow and to simplify the litigation process. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Jay Willis
  However, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences laments the lack of objective standards for determining threshold levels of attorney negligence, and he urges the Court to issue a clearer test for the issue next Term. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences has this post about the winners of yesterday's primaries for the Republican and Democratic nominations for A.G. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:55 am by CJLF Staff
The guests are UC Irvine Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
” Nonetheless, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences, is “particularly interested in knowing whether Ms. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
 Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences chides the Court for using the data without verification. [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:29 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Kent Scheidegger’s notes that it is unclear whether Graham threatens any of the six sentences. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:03 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kent Scheidegger has this post at Crime and Consequences fleshing out the Court's dismissal in Robertson v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
 Kent Scheidegger has commentary on the decision at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
”  Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences denounces the advantage that may be gained in the nomination process by judges with former law clerks in politics, as described Tuesday by Jess Bravin in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:38 am by Steve Hall
Despite having the nation's largest population of condemned prisoners, there has not been an execution in the state since convicted killer Clarence Allen was put to death in January 2006.At least six death row inmates have exhausted all appeals and could be scheduled for execution as soon as the legal reviews are completed, said Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation that supports the resumption of executions.Terry Thornton, spokeswoman for the California… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes the concurrence by Justices Scalia and Thomas, in whose view respondent Buono lacked standing to challenge the cross; Scheidegger complains that “[s]plintered opinions that fail to provide such answers constitute a failure of the institution. [read post]