Search for: "Kitchen v. Doe" Results 461 - 480 of 825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2024, 10:35 am by Giles Peaker
The EPA does not explicitly require “but for” causation to establish a statutory nuisance under section 85(1)-(4). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by 1 Crown Office Row
 It does seem to me as if the event was not considered within a wider context of a longstanding history of vulnerability [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
Nor does Rule 8 even include the term "notice pleading," a phrased often used as if it were some sort of antidote to the need for facts to bolster mere allegations.Twenty years later, the Supreme Court, in Conley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
As noted by Justice Perram in the Capic v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
[Today's guest post is from Robert K S, who is a patent attorney from Cleveland, Ohio.]Countering obviousness rejections can be both the most quotidian and the most challenging task of the patent practitioner or pro se applicant. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am by Aurora Barnes
McDaniels 17-682 Issues: (1) Whether a one-sentence allegation of fact in the background section of a prisoner’s state court brief can be sufficient to exhaust a novel and complex federal constitutional double jeopardy claim; and (2) whether it is unreasonable to conclude that double jeopardy does not bar retrial, when the Supreme Court has repeatedly indicated that double jeopardy does not apply if the trial court lacks the power to enter a verdict. [read post]