Search for: "LJ"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm
Faced with the problem of how to provide legal counsel to those who cannot afford to hire their own attorney after Gideon v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
Buxton LJ gave a concurring judgment and Tuckey LJ agreed with both. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am
Issues considered by the Court of Appeal: The court, led by Lewison LJ, with whom Arden LJ and Davis LJ agreed, allowed the appeal of the Valuation Officer. 1. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am
Floyd LJ’s judgment (with which Arnold LJ and Males LJ agreed) starts, as would be expected, with a summary of the background and timetable. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am
PatentsGuestKat Léon Dijkman provided an index of some of the most interesting issues in Arnold LJ's wide-ranging FibroGen v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
Floyd LJ commented that on his construction of the claim “it is plain that Warner-Lambert have an arguable case of infringement”. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 12:35 am
Jackson LJ agreed. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
The Court of Appeal upheld that decision in May 2008 ([2008] EWCA Civ 445), the leading judgment being given by Jacob LJ, and in 2009 the EPO Technical Board of Appeal revoked the patent. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
The Court of Appeal upheld that decision in May 2008 ([2008] EWCA Civ 445), the leading judgment being given by Jacob LJ, and in 2009 the EPO Technical Board of Appeal revoked the patent. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
Court of Appeal BF’s appeal was allowed by a majority (Underhill LJ and Baker LJ, with Simon LJ dissenting). [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
Both Maurice Kay LJ, Justice Tomlinson LJ agreed with Hooper LJ and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On 1 February 2021 Underhill LJ ordered that the hearing should take place if possible between 15 and 31 March 2021. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:30 pm
Jackson LJ states that this proposal "merits serious consideration". [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:03 pm
I am sure that Leveson LJ would be impartial. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As already noted above Ward LJ felt that it did. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Having failed to overcome the plausibility hurdle, the patentee was not entitled to rely on post-published evidence to show sufficiency.Claire raised some interesting points to consider at the end of her talk:In light of Kitchen LJ’s treatment of paragraphs [0003] and [0006], what is/is not to be recognised as a definition in a Patent? [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 9:52 am
The article discusses the 2005 Hague Convention's rules on jurisdiction (of the chosen and not-chosen courts) and the recognition and enforcement of resulting judgments. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 am
As found by the Hearing Officer in first instance, Pattern LJ agreed that Unilever had been outwardly unaffected by the Shanks patents, so no outstanding benefit could be attributed. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:53 am
Briggs LJ noted that jurisdiction within section 37(1) SCA in substance reflects an originally unfettered jurisdiction exercised by the Court of Chancery on equitable principles. [read post]
