Search for: "Lady v State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
The judgment The leading judgment at the Supreme Court was given jointly by Lady Hale and Lord Toulson. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:47 pm
Kyllo to be a search), but the analogy fails because of the limited information dog sniffs reveal. In past cases, notably United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Google reviewed the relevant case law on CPR 19.6(1), arguing that the authorities (in particular, Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways plc [2011] Ch 345 and Rendlesham Estates plc. v Barr Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3663) supported its position. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
In the UK, the Lady Gaga v Lady Goo Goo (High Court) precedent would certainly give the outcome that the parody constitutes trademark infringement under Article 10 (3) of the UK Trade Marks Act since it takes unfair advantage of the high fashion brands’ market. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:43 pm
HUSSEY, husband and wife; WINCHESTER LAKES CORPORATION; THE HONORABLE RICK SCOTT, Governor of the State of Florida; and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION; and COLLIER COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY, INC., Appellees. 2nd District.The Law Lady. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:23 am
Moreover, art 8 of the 2006 Regulations transposed art 3 which obliges member states to facilitate, in accordance with their national legislation, the entry and residence of EFMs. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
In state court, in the state of Washington (Spokane). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
Here are the articles (full access is limited to subscribers):Laura Weinrib (University of Chicago), "The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:55 pm
The title of this post is the Oregon Secretary of State's description of the situation with that state's governor. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 12:56 pm
‘Ladies, I’m so sorry to tell you that the law for abortion has been overturned,’ she said. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Patmalniece (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 11 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that pensioners from other European Union states should not have the right to claim pension credits in the UK. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:48 am
The Special Supreme Court of Texas handed down its lone opinion in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
