Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 461 - 480
of 39,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
“I think that (the city) should do a little bit more. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm
" That said, at least the "inflation" point was, I think, really more about being snarky ("pedantic") than some fundamental doctrinal problem with the dissent's alternative approach.Still, it definitely livened things up.Speaking of livening things up, I also had to smile a little bit with the deadpan manner in which Judge Van Dyke ended the next footnote, which concludes with:"93.2% of statistics give the illusion of quantitative certainty while providing… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
Williams v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
” There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:51 am
Ayromlooi v Staten Is. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
The conviction of Rausing aside, however, since R v Hunter in 1974 there appear to have been nine fully-reported cases of the offence in England and Wales: R v Swindell (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 255; R v Parry and McLean (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 470; R v Skinner (Patrick and Ian) (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 115; R v Godward [1998] 1 Cr App R (S) 385; R v Lang (Jack Thomas) [2001] EWCA Crim 2690, [2002] 2 Cr App R… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm
I think maybe a more fitting observation (and one that Gemini noted in the Apple v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Fortunately, at least one county employee thought that breaking the law must be a little more complicated than that, and this person went to Breaking Through News to blow the whistle. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
Even a little. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Marion County or Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
This would add little if anything to the other elements of s.10(2) and s.10(3) TMA, but it would add something to the other elements of s.10(1) TMA. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:01 am
As you may know, applicants must also prove that they are economically disadvantaged, though the requirements to qualify as such are a little more objective. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
It is a little difficult to understand the claims in Peterec-Tolino v Ciacci2024 NY Slip Op 01259 Decided on March 07, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:49 pm
She also holds a doctorate in Law and was a professor at the University of Louvain.Sue Willman (Deighton Pierce Glynn Solicitors): Sue established DPG’s public law and human rights team and has represented the applicant in JN v The United Kingdom before the ECtHR. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:16 am
From Judge William Alsup's Tentative Order filed Tuesday in Doe v. [read post]