Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 461 - 480 of 39,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm
" That said, at least the "inflation" point was, I think, really more about being snarky ("pedantic") than some fundamental doctrinal problem with the dissent's alternative approach.Still, it definitely livened things up.Speaking of livening things up, I also had to smile a little bit with the deadpan manner in which Judge Van Dyke ended the next footnote, which concludes with:"93.2% of statistics give the illusion of quantitative certainty while providing… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”              There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by Frank Cranmer
The conviction of Rausing aside, however, since R v Hunter in 1974 there appear to have been nine fully-reported cases of the offence in England and Wales: R v Swindell (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 255; R v Parry and McLean (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 470; R v Skinner (Patrick and Ian) (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 115; R v Godward [1998] 1 Cr App R (S) 385;  R v Lang (Jack Thomas) [2001] EWCA Crim 2690, [2002] 2 Cr App R… [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm by Will Newman
I think maybe a more fitting observation (and one that Gemini noted in the Apple v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Fortunately, at least one county employee thought that breaking the law must be a little more complicated than that, and this person went to Breaking Through News to blow the whistle. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am by Julius Stobbs (Stobbs IP)
This would add little if anything to the other elements of s.10(2) and s.10(3) TMA, but it would add something to the other elements of s.10(1) TMA. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:01 am by Stephanie Ellis
As you may know, applicants must also prove that they are economically disadvantaged, though the requirements to qualify as such are a little more objective. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is a little difficult to understand the claims in Peterec-Tolino v Ciacci2024 NY Slip Op 01259 Decided on March 07, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:49 pm by Emmanuel Didier
She also holds a doctorate in Law and was a professor at the University of Louvain.Sue Willman (Deighton Pierce Glynn Solicitors): Sue established DPG’s public law and human rights team and has represented the applicant in JN v The United Kingdom before the ECtHR. [read post]