Search for: "Lopez v. United State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,007
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342, 246 Fed.Appx. 7 (2d Cir.2007) (same). [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:04 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:28 am
In Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
(2) How does the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
In light of United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 2:26 pm
CAAF’s third and final oral argument on Monday is in the “unusually interesting” Article 62 case of United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
If you listened to the oral arguments in front the Supreme Court, and you thought that some of the questions being asked by the Justices displayed an inability to comprehend the basic functioning of health insurance in the United States, congratulations. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
Recently, Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh Circuit pondered similar connundra in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
United States, and City of Boerne v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
