Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 4:27 pm
Lord Abbett Municipal Income Fund Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
Lord Justice Floyd’s reasoning chimes with the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, which states that “an application may only be objected to for lack of sufficient disclosure if there are serious doubts, substantiated by verifiable facts” (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, II, C.6.1.4). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
Lord Brodie – Prosecutors lied to obtain warrant. [read post]
Hanging By A Thread: Reportage and Clause 4 of the Defamation Bill – Sophie Walker and Jason Bosland
11 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
In the seminal cases of Al-Fagih v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Particularly, Lord Sumption, together with Lord Reed, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs, found that if claims 1 and 3 had been valid, they would not have been infringed, but differed in their reasons. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield District Council [2009] EWCA Civ 285 was an appeal of a summary possession that had been stayed pending Doherty in the Lords. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
Lord Reed identifies four principal errors in the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
(Both Jan Luba QC for Doherty and Philip Sales QC for the Secretary of State challenged this point and it was not uniformly accepted - see below). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
For the majority, Lord Wilson gave the main judgment. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Lord Carloway agreed with Lord Tyre and his reasoning. and held on that basis Lord Tyre was correct to find that no prima facie case existed. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
The appeal is set down for a one day hearing before Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption gave the reasons for the referral to the Court of Justice, with which the rest of the Justices agreed. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Lord Reed gave a dissenting judgment. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
It would be fair to say that the House of Lords judgment in the joined appeals in Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKHL 36 has come as something of surprise. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:54 am
In Askew v. [read post]
