Search for: "Lowe v. Georgia" Results 461 - 480 of 540
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
The agency has already asked the industry to restrict pilot commutes, because the risk of fatigue may be boosted by major carriers’ increasing use of regional jets with low-paid pilots who can’t afford motel rooms. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
City of Joliet Docket: 09-435; 09-445 Issue: (1) Whether a local municipality may condemn certain federally subsidized, low-income, multifamily housing, when federal law explicitly requires the property to be maintained for at least thirty years as housing for low-income families; and (2) after Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 1:50 pm by Jim Gerl
AP: You know, because my son is 26 and he's an engineer and at Georgia Tech right now and they're paying for his education. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
" (quoting Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
October 31,  2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:52 pm by Gary L. Britt, CPA, J.D.
The EITC is already thegovernment's largest cash assistance program targeted to low-incomeAmericans. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Objection rates are inadequate both because their number is so low and because many of the objections were not interposed for intentionally discriminatory conduct. [read post]