Search for: "M/V LORD"
Results 461 - 480
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2015, 2:57 pm
Because…er…I’m worth it. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
I'm sure Cambridge will understand and cope!] [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:18 am
Lord Justice Lewison referred to the case of Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2018] 1 WLR 643 where the phrase “grounds which appear to the court to be substantial” was considered but in the context of insolvency proceedings. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am
In 2011, a successful application for security for costs was made before Lord Justice Sedley and Lord Justice Pitchford. [read post]
29 May 2011, 2:51 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
One such decision was that in Mimo Connect v Buley & Ors, which ended up in the Court of Appeal a month ago with the decision of Lord Justice Bean (giving Judgment of the Court) handed down two weeks ago ([2023] EWCA Civ 909).BackgroundAs she said in the last post, trade secrets cases are full of facts, so buckle in. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Just in time for Murdoch’s visit, Tom Watson MP has released his new book, co-written with journalist Martin Hickman, Dial M for Murdoch. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm
.: Today, before a packed Supreme Court audience, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 6:51 pm
(I once had Joshua Locke, the student denied a scholarship in Locke v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
But I'm getting ahead of myself - first, the facts and judgment. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
But I'm getting ahead of myself - first, the facts and judgment. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
LORD TRIESMAN V UTV MEDIA, 9/12/2010 3. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case above, W v M & Ors [2011] EWHC 1197 (COP), Mr Justice Baker raised concerns that the family of ‘M’ gave “real consideration” over whether to continue with the case once they discovered the press interest in identifying and contacting them. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Applying the House of Lords decision in Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA [2005] UKHL 43, Tomlinson J held that an error of law does not involve an excess of power under section 68(2)(b) of the Act. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:30 am
By Eric Goldman La Court v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:01 pm
Sorry for the delay - I'm off to my other guilty secret, "The Good Wife" … [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
