Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 461 - 480 of 3,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Singer Cardi B’s defamation suit against YouTuber Latasha Kebe began this week, with Cardi B testifying herself. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by R. David Donoghue
CZS Holdings LLC d/b/a Pur360, No. 20 C 6886, Slip Op. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
The necessary inference to be drawn from the express language of s. 95(2.4)(b) is that Parliament chose not to include a competition element in the financial institution exception. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As long-time readers of this blog know, one of the long-range concerns in the D&O insurance industry is the possible exposures of corporate directors and officers to liability claims arising from climate change (as discussed most recently here). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
This Bill received Royal Assent in May 2021 and revised the Judges Act, RSC 1985, c J-1, such that in order to be eligible for appointment to superior courts, prospective judges undertake to participate in continuing education on sexual assault law and social context (s 3(b)). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
The fact of the findings and the nature of the findings b. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
In assessing an association for causality, the starting point is “an association between two variables, perfectly clear-cut and beyond what we would care to attribute to the play of chance. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]