Search for: "MATTER OF J W J C"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Albert C. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Agado, 964 P.2d 565, 569 (Colorado Court of Appeals 1998) (Briggs, J., specially concurring), and citing several other cases). [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
W told McClendon that she and defendant had had a heated argument and that, as she tried to leave the home with her belongings, defendant had punched her in the face—`[j]ust clocked me.W also told McClendon that, at some point during the altercation, before defendant punched her, he `probably hit record. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm
Andrew Currah, J. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 8:18 pm
There follows irrelevance, because there appears to be a desire to approach treaty elaboration in the grand 19th century style misattributed to the Second Reich’s Bismarck: “Gesetze sind wie Würste, man sollte besser nicht dabei sein, wenn sie gemacht warden” (Fred R. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Thus, where a grand jury's subpoena, given its overbreadth, would itself violate the privacy interests protected by the Fourth Amendment, `[j]udicial supervision is properly exercised in such cases to prevent the wrong before it occurs. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
[I think this is a matter of leveraging reciprocity norms; Ramsey mentions guilt.] [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Knuckles, 196 W. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:22 am
Lerner’s lawyer, William W. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Statehood matters. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Statehood matters. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Statehood matters. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
Miller and TIGTA Inspector General J. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
In the matter of D (A child), heard on 23 May 2016. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
McGeveran: Coordination isn’t a matter of mere tidiness; need an independent reason to police the boundary. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
In the matter of D (A child), heard on 23 May 2016. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Maruksen, Jay C. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
It held that the Elder Abuse Act does not require the existence of a custodial relationship in order for the plaintiff to establish a cause of action for neglect.[2] The court also rejected defendants’ contention that the trial court should determine, as a matter of law, whether defendants’ conduct constituted professional negligence rather than neglect. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
Gabe Cazares, National Federation of the Blind: Need to be fleshed out, b/c current procedures are too burdensome. [read post]
