Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2012, 11:01 am
However, according to the case law, obviousness is not a criterium for assessing whether subject-matter is supported by the application as filed. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Therefore, the [opponent’s] objection in effect merely relates to the determination of the exact scope of the claim, which is a matter of A 84 rather than A 83. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
The claims as granted comprise two independent claims : claim 1 relating to a composition consisting of (a), (b) and (c).and claim 11 relating to a dietary supplement for the prevention of inflammatory processes and articular disorders consisting of an admixture of (a) and (b), wherein the wording of features (a) and (b) are identical for both claims. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Collins, Ward K. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
If any reader can shed some light on this matter, please do so.To download the whole decision, click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
An isolated variant hepatitis B surface antigen comprising an amino acid sequence wherein mutations from hepatitis B wild type ayw2 strain appear as follows: at position 103 isoleucine is present instead of methionine, at position 118 lysine is present instead of threonine, at position 120 glutamine is present instead of proline, at position 170 serine is present instead of leucine, and at position 213 serine is present instead of leucine. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case there is no doubt that requirements (a) and (b) have been met. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Novelty[3] Since it was not contested by the [patent proprietor] that the washing machine with model number WD-R100C constituting the established public prior use, as exemplified in Appendix B, comprises all features of claim 1 of the patent in suit and since the Board finds no reason to conclude otherwise, the subject-matter of claim 1 lacks novelty (A 54(1)) and the [patent proprietor’s] main request is therefore not allowable. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:01 pm
(b) “This catalyst has a volume average particle size of about 40 nanometres” […]. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:50 pm
The court looked to Indiana Code 35-41-1-1(b), which states that Indiana has jurisdiction if conduct or a result that is an element of the crime occurred in Indiana. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:40 pm
The Equity pension plan, like AFTRA’s, is a defined benefit plan; interestingly, Equity also has a 401(k) plan. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Rule 99(1)(b) and (c) EPC specifies that the notice of appeal shall contain an indication of the decision impugned, and a request defining the subject of the appeal, respectively. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A further repetition of the process of Example 8 performed by the appellant, the experimental details of which were provided in Annex B of letter dated 8 March 2013, confirmed said conclusion. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:36 am
Following the frequency vote, a company must disclose on a Form 8-K how often it will hold the say-on-pay vote. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
It matters because the allegations in the suit matter. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 2:42 pm
Property settlement might not be able to be determined until the children's matter is sorted out. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 11:01 am
Question (b) has therefore to be answered in the negative. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:07 pm
No matter how intimidating it might be, always open the mail. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:01 pm
What if the claimed differences are the result of long-term legal developments affecting the patentability assessment of new subject-matter? [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:55 am
Only by virtue of the provisions of Section 541(b)(7) that reference sums “withheld by an employer” were the contributions deductible in calculating “current monthly income”. [read post]
