Search for: "MATTER OF M J R" Results 461 - 480 of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
 NPR has published a book list for Black History Month, "How Black Lives Have Always Mattered: A Reading List. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
It should be noted that Nicol J was "unclear" about how widely the annual report had been disseminated (see s 167(7)) but that didn't matter as Mr Babakandi had been advantaged by his promotion (at [21]; note to self: it may matter in other cases). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
It should be noted that Nicol J was "unclear" about how widely the annual report had been disseminated (see s 167(7)) but that didn't matter as Mr Babakandi had been advantaged by his promotion (at [21]; note to self: it may matter in other cases). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has released guidance on reporting on faith issues, promoting best practice on handling matters with due sensitivity. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Skorski, 2017 ONSC 6594 J R Henderson J awarded defamation damages of Can$10,000 to the plaintiff arising out of defamatory website publications concerning alleged financial irregularities at an old people’s home. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:26 pm by Ted Folkman
The Federal Rules are silent, and the letter is pretty plainly not a citation of supplemental authorities under Rule 28(j). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
 . to treat it as synonymous with ‘mandatory’ ” as a general matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
In R(M) v Newham LBC (2020) EWHC 327 (Admin), these were the apparently vexed, but important, questions for Linden J, in circumstances which the evidence suggested were pretty awful (and I wonder if Newham might reflect that this was a poor case to run, even though the question of law requires authoritative judgment). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
In R(M) v Newham LBC (2020) EWHC 327 (Admin), these were the apparently vexed, but important, questions for Linden J, in circumstances which the evidence suggested were pretty awful (and I wonder if Newham might reflect that this was a poor case to run, even though the question of law requires authoritative judgment). [read post]