Search for: "MATTER OF M J S" Results 461 - 480 of 4,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2010, 5:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
May 25, 2010, Amesbury, J.), in which the Court granted the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, thereby dismissing the Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages in a motor vehicle accident case based upon the Defendant driver having been found guilty of violating the Motor Vehicle Code in permitting his vehicle to cross the center line of the roadway and impact the Plaintiff’s vehicle.In this matter, the Plaintiff had alleged in the Complaint… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
  The Court's companion Order can be viewed HERE.I thank Attorney James M. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
Despite the agency's efforts to assist the respondent father to improve his deficient parenting skills and to remediate his propensity for domestic violence, the father's aggressive and threatening behavior continued unabated (see Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 NY2d 838, 841-842 [1986]; see also Matter of Jennifer R., 29 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2006]; Matter of Ajuwon H., 18 AD3d 752 [2005]). [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 5:23 pm
But now "doing" is something I've had enough of, after two years of doing it and doing it and doing it well (Thanks LL Cool J) and I'm ready to start thinking again. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 6:47 am
(Isicoff J.) the Court denied a casino's motion for summary judgment in its adversary proceeding to determine an alleged gambling debt nondischargeable. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:51 pm by Dan Markel
Part II plays offense against R-M's proposed model to disestablish the family, and Part III engages Prof. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
… I’m not sure that the prior restraint analysis is entirely sound, but the bottom line strikes me as correct. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
Mar. 13, 2008) (Pallmeyer, J.).Judge Pallmeyer held that the advertising injury claim in plaintiff Capitol Indemnity's ("CI") insurance policy required that it defend defendants the "Elston Grocery" defendants in the underlying trademark infringement, unfair competition and Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act ("IDTPA") claims. [read post]