Search for: "MDL Panel" Results 461 - 480 of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2008, 1:53 pm
Defense attorneys for Chiquita filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:31 pm by Barry Barnett
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation this Thursday at the Duke University School of Law in Durham, North Carolina. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 5:45 am
Plaintiffs in the South Carolina class action filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:41 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 5:38 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:36 am
Plaintiffs filed a motion with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) to centralize the lawsuits for pretrial purposes in the Northern District of Illinois; defense attorneys agreed that pretrial coordination was warranted under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 but requested transfer to the Southern District of New York. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:29 am
Defense attorneys for several of the defendants – specifically, Zimmer Holdings, Zimmer, Inc., Stryker Corp., Biomet, DePuy Orthopaedics and/or DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Smith & Nephew plc and Smith & Nephew, Inc., id., at *1 n.2 – filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:33 am
Plaintiff’s lawyer in the Iowa class action filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:39 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers in four of the class action cases filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 5:14 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 5:41 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:37 am
Plaintiff's lawyer in one of the New Jersey class actions filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class action lawsuits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:08 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers in three of the class actions filed motions with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 7:49 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:37 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:23 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 6:10 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]