Search for: "Mann v. Mann" Results 461 - 480 of 1,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
The damages awarded well exceeded those previously payable, as justified in the tour de force of a judgment by Mann J in Gulati v MGN ([2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
  The appeal was allowed, resulting in the judgment of Mann J on finding the patent to be invalid being overturned. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Timothy Simeone
During Wednesday’s argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Josh Wright
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
Ronald Mann previews today’s second oral argument, in the bankruptcy case Law v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The decision was a strategic choice made in light of the lack of a meritorious defense (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292 [1st Dept 2001]). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, at this blog, Ronald Mann recaps Tuesday’s arguments in Hall v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:23 pm
  Thanks to Columbia Law School (one of my alma maters) Professor Ronald Mann for the heads-up. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:11 am
Further, as defendants were retained to try to obtain a reduction in the penalties assessed against plaintiffs, and they succeeded, there can be no claim that they breached a duty to plaintiffs (see generally Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001]). [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:11 am
Further, as defendants were retained to try to obtain a reduction in the penalties assessed against plaintiffs, and they succeeded, there can be no claim that they breached a duty to plaintiffs (see generally Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001]). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am by Amy Howe
Mann was not involved in our coverage of the case.] [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Quantum in Privacy Cases The judge considered thirteen “comparables” – from Cornelius v Taranto ([2001] EMLR 329) to Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2014] EMLR 24) ([171] to [183]). [read post]