Search for: "Marbury v. Madison" Results 461 - 480 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
Marshall, famously, had earlier decided in Marbury v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
Madison was decided in 1804 and we certainly think of Marbury as a "founding moment. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Professor Douglas Edlin of Dickinson College convincingly argues that two forms of judicial review existed at the time Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:28 am by Dale Carpenter
As Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Hearron should have said:Your honor, under the Blackstonian maxim for every right a remedy, invoked by John Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm by Derek Muller
” And Roberts cited none other than Marbury v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
  The Book of Genesis -- sort of the  Marbury v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:32 am by Joe Palazzolo
” In his column Friday, Tribe said the president’s comments were distorted and exaggerated: The “unprecedented, extraordinary” step he noted the justices would be taking if they were to overturn the Affordable Care Act was, of course, not the step of exercising judicial review, as the court has done ever since Marbury v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:49 am
We'll let readers draw their own conclusions, but offer up a few other fun observations from our research: * Together, John Marshall (of Marbury v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s ruling in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:09 am
It should keep in mind, however, that whether the Legislature has met its constitutional obligations in that regard is within the province of this Court (see Marbury v Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177 [1803]). [read post]