Search for: "Mark Wells "
Results 461 - 480
of 46,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2017, 12:06 am
The High Court case is well covered by this blog and you can view those summaries here, here, here and on CNBC Africa, here. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Thank you, as well, to our listeners for supporting LawNext on Patreon. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:19 am
(Seems to me that the court should have addressed the continuing violation theory here as well: Although false marking may happen just once, we might want to treat the advertising differently under advertising law.) [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
The SEC responded to Mark Cuban’s motion to dismiss by taking the position that this case involved a well-settled application of insider trading principles and that Cuban traded on material, non-public information after he agreed to keep the information confidential. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:27 am
Mark Hopkins (Mark Lewton Hopkins CRD#: 2653473) is a former registered broker who was registered with American Portfolios Financial Services, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 5:13 am
It will no doubt be of value as a reference text, or those looking for a well-researched and thoughtful introduction into the often-under explored world of these shy trademark beasts.Book details:ISBN: 978 1 78536 879 0£112.50320 ppHardback Available from Edward Elgar Publishers here. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:00 pm
SO I GOT A MESSAGE ANNOUNCING markdowns on the new Apple Macbook Pros, and, well, technically they’re marked down, but come on . . . . [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:44 pm
In my initial reaction to Mark Hurd's firing, I assumed that he was being terminated for an ethical lapse. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:30 am
Happy to be here Mark. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am
So, when this Kat saw that the UK Intellectual Property Office turned down a registration attempt by Tefal for their ‘red dot’ mark last month, well… she wasn’t not going to look into it a bit more.The Tefal 'red dot' mark in questionIn the present case, registration of the mark in the UK was denied due to lack of distinctiveness under Art 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (‘TMA’). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:33 am
However, a court may set the damages assessed to each article well below the $500 maximum in order to avoid what they might feel is an excessive penalty.We will keep you posted.This case is Patent Compliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:29 pm
Gray on Claims has recently added a new feature to track these newly filed false marking cases, as well as those filed prior to the Forest Group decision. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:58 am
The post A Steep Climb to Own a One Word Mark? [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
Well, it turns out that whatever the “Caffè Nero” mark is meant to convey, branding edginess, Italian style, was apparently not at the top of the list, if at all. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
He represents many Fortune 500 companies with all of their construction law needs including construction contract drafting, breach of contract issues, prompt payment act claims, all types of construction liens, surety bond claims as well as general business law licensing. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm
Inequitable conduct - two cases presented the issue of whether a finding that a patent is unenforceable makes marking with that patent "false marking" under the statute. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
Well, nothing. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:19 am
Sometimes a mark is almost too well known for its own good. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
However, in our view, we consider that it might well have been possible to register the three-dimensional Coke bottle shape had Coke not been so ambitious in their application and applied only for the more distinctive fluted bottle-shape that was referred to within much of their evidence – rather than the more generic shape in their application. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:49 pm
Incidentally, such trade mark was registered in spring 2019 and the invalidity challenge was launched just a few months later.Let’s see how the Board reasoned. [read post]
