Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 5:48 am
But they generally get good marks in both screening and deterrence. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:06 pm
Angus King, I- Maine, and Rand Paul, R-KY. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
I recognize we may have different clients. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
Marks can still get arrested: that is where an experienced criminal defense is particularly important. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm
That is, Congress has heretofore decided that if online services commit the aforementioned child sex offenses, the sole enforcer should be the Department of Justice, not civil plaintiffs. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Chief Justice Declines to Testify Before Congress Over Ethics Concerns DNyuz – Abbie VanSickle (New York Times) | Published: 4/25/2023 Chief Justice John Roberts told the Senate Judiciary Committee he was declining its invitation to testify about ethics rules for the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Personally, as I said to the Los Angeles Times some time ago, “I think that anything that can poison or kill a person should be listed as an adulterant [in food]. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:31 am
This includes testimony before Congress on Antifa’s central role in the anti-free speech movement nationally. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:38 pm
In a subsequent post I will address what I think will happen with the debt limit. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Personally, as I said to the Los Angeles Times some time ago, “I think that anything that can poison or kill a person should be listed as an adulterant [in food]. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 10:20 am
“You know, there is a text that says that Congress shall make no law infringing the freedom of speech. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
As I wrote in January, the case stemmed from the Southern District of New York’s indictment of Halkbank, which is majority-owned by the government of Turkey, on charges of sanctions evasion. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am
For an academic pro-regulatory perspective, there were comments submitted by professors Mark Lemley and Orly Lobel. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Mark Fleming argues for Fernando Cordero-Garcia. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 3:53 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that the subpoena to Pomeranz was issued with a “valid legislative purpose” and that “[i]t is not the role of the federal judiciary to dictate what legislation Congress may consider or how it should conduct its deliberations in that connection. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:58 pm
(and an appeal has already been filed); I'm on the run and don't have the time to focus on it further, but I thought I'd pass along some key paragraphs from the opening and closing parts. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
" And Article I vests Congress rather than the Judiciary with the power to "define and punish . . . [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
(I cannot say, of course, whether Jordan’s hypocrisy will lead a judge to subconsciously view his filings with a more jaundiced eye.) [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
I hope it will be soon. [read post]
