Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 461 - 480
of 34,442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2021, 8:42 pm
The New York Times reported on the filing of House’s lawsuit against Mark Twain on January 27, 1890The “stolen ideas” lawsuit, captioned House v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:05 am
Solo Cup and Pequignot v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:50 am
Mark Johnson, Individually and as Guardian of David Johnson, an incompetent, Glenda Johnson and Gary Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
"San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
In Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor, the Supreme Court has given judgments that will not be welcomed by the tenant community. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Ineos Healthcare Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, other party) (Case T-222/09); [2011] WLR (D) 53 “In opposition proceedings against registration of a trade mark pursuant to article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94, the opposing party was not obliged to adduce evidence in support of the opposition. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
" Shizzle Pop, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:05 am
This case ABP Technology Ltd v Voyetra Turtle Beach, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 3:02 pm
Wade Anniversary: As we mark the 39th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:17 am
Adams & Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:23 am
To the contrary, Graber argues that “the result in Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
Denis Parish v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law… [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:02 am
Marks of St. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The other conditions - namely, that the rights to the sign were acquired prior to the date of application for registration of the EU trade mark, and that the sign confers upon its proprietor the right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark - were to be considered in light of the criteria set out by the law of the Member State governing that sign, so UK law.The relevant UK provision (section 5(4) of the Trade Mark Act 1994) provides that a trade mark shall not be… [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:55 pm
In Cheah v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:30 am
In Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:12 am
Now, in Iancu v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:01 am
We have previously posted links to Professor Mark DeAngelis's "Law Lessongs" on Raffles v. [read post]
