Search for: "Markes v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 10,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Mark Coulson (D. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
He summarised the position as follows: “It is therefore taken as a constitutional gospel in all commonwealth jurisdictions and also the United States that courts have no business handling religious questions. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
” This exclusionary criterion ensures lack of viewpoint diversity, and makes the Collegium an effective proxy for the law industry in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Introduction The end of September marked the close of the 2023 fiscal year for the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Introduction The end of September marked the close of the 2023 fiscal year for the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:35 am
Further, VICC failed to establish that its two marks had acquired secondary meaning (VI Carnival Committee Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:05 am
United States: 23 For Government, 1 For Taxpayer: Reply Brief For Petitioners, Moore v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
” The Guardian and Sky News have more information The Metropolitan police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley defied calls for a ban on a pro-Palestinian march through London on Armistice Day as he insisted on the independence of his force amid intense government pressure to act. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm
Simultaneously, the defendants filed a suit in the United States District Court, asserting non-infringement of the plaintiffs’ rights. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The legal system of the United States has its roots in the laws of England. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in Apple v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Check carefully that both the FDA and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) receive the same information. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
And in 2001 the Supreme Court ruled in Alexander v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am
Decisions this Week United StatesPennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
See TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
See TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
In a previous post, I wrote about the attempt by Merrick Garland's Justice Department in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]