Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 461 - 480
of 21,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
“A party that seeks sanctions for spoliation of evidence must show that the party having control over the evidence possessed an obligation to preserve it at the time of its destruction, that the evidence was destroyed with a culpable state of mind, and that the destroyed evidence was relevant to the party’s claim or defense such that the trier of fact could find that the evidence would support that claim or defense” (Pegasus Aviation I, Inc. v Varig Logistica… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
Mark Lunney (King's College London, UK)9. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
He contextualizes this technical intervention through the historical innovations that have made their mark in both courts and across the legal domain. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:43 am
According to a statement that Tennessee Coordinator of Elections Mark Goins gave The Tennessean, the state’s Supreme Court “made it clear” in the 2023 case Falls v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
“The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists’ report of an alleged successful attack on M/V Ocean Jazz is patently false,” the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:59 am
” * United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:52 am
The Bombay High Court of India in a special hearing on Sunday dismissed a public interest litigation, which is a petition filed for public good, filed by four law students from Maharashtra and Gujarat states challenging the decision of the Maharashtra government to declare January 22 a public holiday to mark the consecration ceremony of the controversial Ram Mandir temple in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 8:59 pm
Pyper v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Here is a case from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Roku, Inc. v. [read post]