Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 10,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Horvath, Julien Bourgeois and Mark D. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Horvath, Julien Bourgeois and Mark D. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The case is Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm
CDC, “Outbreaks of Gastroenteritis Associated with Noroviruses on Cruise Ships – United States, 2002,” MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, Vol. 51, No. 49, pp. 1112-15 (Dec. 13, 2002). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
” Anyone listening carefully to the argument will discover that this framing is off the mark. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am
" Justice Sotomayor explains further: The Supreme Court of the United States declares that a particular kind of business, though open to the public, has a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN> Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
That resulting consumer confusion in the United States, however, falls squarely within the scope of the interests that the Lanham Act seeks to protect. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
That resulting consumer confusion in the United States, however, falls squarely within the scope of the interests that the Lanham Act seeks to protect. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 Secretary of State for Transport v… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
Nebraska marks a new chapter in debates about the major questions doctrine (MQD). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
This means that the Lanham Act, which protects against trademark infringement, does not apply outside the United States. [read post]
