Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice" Results 461 - 480 of 1,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Cody M. Poplin
The Department of Justice is appealing that ruling. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:10 pm by Peter Margulies
” That observation dovetails with the Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am by Nicholas Rasmussen
Five years ago today, white supremacist extremists from across the United States traveled to Charlottesville, Virginia for the “Unite the Right” rally. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
United States on behalf of Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Justice Department. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:54 am by Paras Shah
As the Supreme Court’s opinion last term in Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by Jacob Sapochnick
Víctor Nieblas, an immigration attorney based in Southern California, told CNN in September that the court's decision could affect hundreds of other young professionals in the United States who are seeking a license. [read post]
“They are ‘owned by, produced by or for, or . . . under the control of the United States Government. . . . [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am by Tara Hofbauer
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
More specifically, in his opinion last Term dissenting from a denial of cert in Buffington v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Nicole Reustle
United States (2010) The Department of Defense established a policy that entitled military personnel who were forcibly discharged for homosexuality (before the end of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”) to only half the separation pay guaranteed to honorably discharged soldiers. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Mrs Justice Gloster made a Norwich Pharmacal order in the case of Halpern v Google. [read post]