Search for: "Materials Innovations, Inc." Results 461 - 480 of 1,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 7:09 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Frank Pusateri (Adriondack Portfolio Management, Inc) Bucky Isaacson (Future Funding Consultants) 9:00 – 9:30 – Marketing in Europe (Sponsored by Horizon Cash Management, LLC) Cecilia Mortimore (Credit-Suisse Securities (USA) LLC) 9:30 – 10:00 – Institutional Marketing (Sponsored by Mallon P.C.) [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:38 am by Alison Rowe
Jenny Workman provided innovative tips on how equine photographers can protect their work product. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:42 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Cir. 2012); In re California Innovations, Inc., 329 F.3d 1334, 66 USPQ2d 1853 (Fed. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:02 am by Florian Mueller
The European Union, which is already dysfunctional in some even more important regards, threatens to become the world's craziest, most innovation-hostile copyright jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Emily S. Bremer
Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc. [read post]
  While patent eligibility of biological subject matter has the potential to allow for greater innovations, like modified organ transplants, expanding patent-eligible material may lead to negative downstream impacts. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:50 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 8:01 am by Rob Robinson
Complete Filing: Form S-1 Registration Statement – KLDiscovery, Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,824,718 entitled PROCESS OF MAKING A FIBROUS ELECTRET WEB and owned by3M Innovative Properties Company. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,824,718 entitled PROCESS OF MAKING A FIBROUS ELECTRET WEB and owned by3M Innovative Properties Company. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]