Search for: "Matter of Application of Graham"
Results 461 - 480
of 658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Accordingly, the contours of the ‘substantial support’ and ‘associated forces’ bases of detention will need to be further developed in their application to concrete facts in individual cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:58 pm
Here’s a copy of that Stalinist… no… I meant, simplified application: CFPB Proposed Credit Card Applicaiton// Yeppers, after looking at that application, I see exactly what Senator Graham means now. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:19 am
Attorney's Office's Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, paralegal specialist Sarah Reis, forensic accountant Crystal Boodoo, and legal assistant Krishawn Graham. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:19 am
Attorney's Office's Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, paralegal specialist Sarah Reis, forensic accountant Crystal Boodoo, and legal assistant Krishawn Graham. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:54 am
As originally published in the Daily Journal of Commerce Authored by: Clayton Graham There are some good tidings for developers even in the gloom of a sluggish economy. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
Led by Senator Lindsay Graham, though, Congress amended Article 2(a)(10) in 2006 to authorize military jurisdiction over “persons serving with or accompanying an armed force in the field” “in time of declared war or contingency operation,” as defined by 10 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
In Graham v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:21 pm
Amendment No. 1126 reads as follows: (Purpose: To revise the provisions relating to detainee matters) Strike subtitle D of title X and insert the following: Subtitle D–Detainee Matters SEC. 1031. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:22 pm
The cases of Slocum and Paul would seem to be a real-time application of Graham. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:51 pm
Cir. 2011); see also Graham v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:09 am
Global companies increasingly seek to put in place D&O insurance protection applicable in the various countries in which they operate. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
To reiterate, here is how Judge Beaty has responded to the Durham argument:Defendants in this case essentially contend that this Court should take the most restrictive view of the applicable doctrines and should conclude that no provision of the Constitution has been violated, and that no redressable claim can be stated, when government officials intentionally fabricate evidence to frame innocent citizens, even if the evidence is used to indict and arrest those citizens without probable… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:54 am
Sotomayor, writing for the majority, disagreed with Alito’s application of both principles. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
” Furthermore, a stipulation consenting to a reference to a specified referee, executed by the parties in connection with the father's previous petition to modify the visitation schedule, expired upon completion of that matter and did not remain in effect for this matter. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:07 am
” Poulson’s criminal conviction alone was held sufficient to establish the applicability of the exclusion. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:37 pm
" Graham v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
The Patent Act requires that claims "particularly point[ ] out and distinctly claim[ ] the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:17 am
How likely is each and every one to agree with dissenting Judge Graham (sitting by designation) that the commerce power does not permit a purchase mandate – simply because non-purchase does not sound like commerce? [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:25 am
Cir. 1992) (The examiner has the burden of presenting a prima facie case for rejection); Graham v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:33 pm
Graham-Rutledge & Co. v. [read post]
