Search for: "Matter of Booker"
Results 461 - 480
of 557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2007, 8:20 am
Since Booker, this huge issue has been, for the most part, ducked by the circuit courts, which tend to view the post-Booker world as if Blakely and Apprendi never happened. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
Booker, 5 M.J. 238 (C.M.A. 1977), modified by United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 07a0400p.06 2007/10/01 Smith v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
Given the many procedural requirements of the sentencing statutes (and let us not forget Rule 32, as well), post-Booker sentences are open to a large number of procedural challenges on appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Robinson, No. 06-5787A sentence for various drug and firearms offenses is affirmed as: 1) a previous remand of the case was a limited remand, not a general remand, and the district court properly followed the circuit court's directives; 2) although review of Booker claims was not foreclosed by the limited remand, the sentence was neither procedurally nor substantively unreasonable and the 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) factors were properly applied; and 3) there was no abuse of discretion… [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:09 pm
The three rules are: (1) Money matters; (2) Beware the corporate chieftain; and (3) Elected officials violating the public trust should not receive credit for good works. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
(a) Did the Second Circuit err, as a threshold matter, in applying this Court's decision in Storer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:04 am
Booker, the factors that a district court must consider at sentencing, viz., those set forth in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:05 pm
First, the article discusses the recent controversies over the decisions of Justices Scalia (in the Cheney case) and Breyer (Booker and Fanfan) not to recuse themselves. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:50 am
Here, the Circuit did an about-face, relying, of all things, on Booker, which of course has nothing to do with commerce, to conclude that Fabian is "no longer good law. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:04 pm
For lots of (needed) background and good commentary on these matters, check out these prior posts and their comments: Is the Ninth Circuit adopting a policy of equitable Booker retroactivity? [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Booker. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
King, 979 F.2d 801 (10th Cir. 1992), the First says that all that matters is whether the defendants form a conspire to do something violent. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Booker. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
"Shelter-in-place" air control systems at the Booker T. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0310p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 11:14 am
Whether the ratio is unconscionable is a matter for Williams to raise with the legislature. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:17 pm
After graduation from law school, he worked with a several institutions: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, where he handled Internet-related intellectual property matters; the Cory Booker for Mayor campaign, where he worked with the policy and finance groups; and Jumpstart for Young Children, a national non-profit group devoted to improving literacy, language, social, and initiative skills in young children. [read post]
