Search for: "Matter of Brady"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 4:33 am
The answer, according to Dorroh, is it doesn’t matter, because there is nothing, no amount of Brady, absolutely nothing, that will be sufficient to make the prosecution pay for its concealment. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
In Wheeler, the prisoner argues that the Sixth Circuit erred regarding certain evidentiary matters. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
It asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
As for jail calls, I find the AG's opinion fairly confusing, and confused, with respect to both the MMA and Brady doctrine. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Experts say this case could have an even more important impact than the Brady case, at least in West Virginia, given that 90 percent or more of criminal matters end in plea deals, with only a tiny fraction of cases actually going to trial. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Cain 14-10008Issue: (1) Whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
His petition asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:53 am
The legal victory is significant for the Plaintiffs, who will be immediately returned to their positions with the County pending the outcome of trial in the matter. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:20 am
Our adversarial legal system cuts off the "three year old" game, both because some answers are not legally relevant (it doesn't matter, for example, "why" exculpatory evidence didn't reach a defendant, under Brady doctrine), and because some answers are not strategically helpful (it's not helpful, for example, to a Brady claim if defense counsel got a little lazy in looking under the hood of the prosecution's case). [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:34 pm
Connell pivots here and argues that actually, the standards for materiality under Subasic and Brady are identical. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
After all, they did play a significant role in the matter, from the initial charging decisions to conviction and punishment. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Although not exactly on point, in its September 30, 2015 decision in Brady v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:06 pm
Prosecutorial misconduct is a subject matter we have extensively written about here and for which we have received national attention. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
While that decision matters a great deal to Stavros Ganias, Lawfare readers are likely more interested in the underlying Fourth Amendment issue. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am
So what if the cases actually matter? [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:26 am
As a general matter, it's a well-accepted fact that the disciplinary process varies widely from one committee to the next. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:26 am
As a general matter, it's a well-accepted fact that the disciplinary process varies widely from one committee to the next. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Calibrating remedies to bargaining/penalizing those who reject early bargains—opposed to that as a policy matter. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:29 am
Image by The whole thing was bizarre, but yes, no matter how much it might freak you out that someone is going to be going through your cell phone, destroying it in the face of an investigation only makes you look guilty. [read post]
