Search for: "Matter of Levinson"
Results 461 - 480
of 483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2007, 5:14 pm
Rev. 34 (1992) quickly became a cause celebre, producing an entire symposium issue of responses in the Michigan Law Review, including one by Sandy Levinson of this blog.By the time Edwards published his article, however, the handwriting was already on the wall. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:35 pm
Ezra reduces Levinson systematic analysis to a checklist of "improvements. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[1] This month we will continue our study of the classical beginnings of admiralty and maritime law by examining mighty Rome - what its legal system was like, how Rome's laws evolved and amplified the admiralty that came before them, and most importantly how Rome's influence on maritime legal matters influenced a wide array of modern doctrines from maritime tort and contract liability to general average. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 4:28 am
What mattered to the framers was that the constitution committed Americans to having conversations about what constituted an establishment of religion and that there was a good deal of merit in creating a commitment to the conversation, even if no particular results were guaranteed. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 1:48 am
Cowan, 116 F.3d 1360 (10th Cir. 1997), and against the Sixth, see Levinson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 3:25 am
But for many authors the most important factor is our conviction that the ideas and information contained in the book matter. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:36 am
Sandy Levinson, always an astute observer of American politics, writes:And, of course, it is no small matter that Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 10:45 am
According to Gary Mauro, it didn't matter, because he had confessed to other murders (for which he had not received the death sentence).) [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:00 am
My good friend and mentor Sandy Levinson would have us agonize over the possibility that an incompetent president has 740 days yet to reign. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:23 am
Jack Balkin (Yale Law school) and Sanford Levinson (Texas Law School) have posted Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship, 18 Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 155 (2006) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:03 am
This is a serious, difficult book that succeeds in explaining what Dworkin believes, what the other theorists argue, and why it matters who is right.Securing Constitutional Democracy: The Case of Autonomy by James E. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:16 am
Consider, for example, the numerous arguments against the Constitution made in Sandy Levinson's book on the right. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 12:38 pm
There are mistakes in those pages, but they contributed enormously to our understanding of the subject matter, and they did it in real time. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
Matters seem to be quite different when policies go poorly. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:15 pm
Master of the Blog Balkin has encouraged me to post some comments I prepared for the "schmooze" on Sandy Levinson's book. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 3:51 am
On this matter, Sandy and I tend to diverge. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 8:30 am
Text may matter. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 5:35 am
Sandy Levinson and I have just published a new article, Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship, in the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 4:16 pm
Sandy Levinson has an interesting post on a speech made by New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse and the reactions it provoked. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 11:51 am
That structural defect is present no matter which party is in control of the political branches. [read post]
