Search for: "Matter of M. M. v A. A." Results 461 - 480 of 15,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 5:57 pm
I attended the oral arguments this morning at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding the matter of the United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Free speech does not protect employee making a racist statementPereira v Commissioner of Social Services (SJC-08218), the Supreme Judicial Court, Mass., 432 Mass. 251The First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech did not shield a twelve-year public employee from dismissal for telling a racist joke at a political gathering.Linda M. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:47 am by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
C|M|LAW professor Chris Sagers has contributed to the Walters Kluwer’s AntitrustConnect Blog since March, 2011. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:20 am by Josh Blackman
As explained, I'm skeptical about the doctrine of absolute prosecutorial immunity as an original matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 12:44 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
However, Active F and M nonimmigrant students will not be permitted to count online classes toward a full course of study in excess of the regulatory limits stated in 8 CFR 214.2(f)(6)(i)(G) and 8 CFR 214.2(m)(9)(v) for the 2023-24 academic year. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
But if not (and if the plaintiff is a public figure and the article is on a matter of public concern), then the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:04 pm
Both because it just seems wrong as a matter of law and because I don't see why L.A. actually cares. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:21 pm
Matter of Edward Paradiso v Joseph Loeffler In this Article 78 case, petitioner appealed to the Supreme Court to review a determination of the Village of Ocean Beach denying his application for an increase in his annual compensation. [read post]