Search for: "Matter of Nichols" Results 461 - 480 of 613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Instead, what mattered was that “the relationship between them is an established one which plainly requires the flow of free and frank communications in both directions on all questions relevant to the discharge of the Bar Council’s functions” [39]. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:11 am by Falk Metzler
Simon Phipps, OSI director in charge with drafting the complaint, further emphasised that this is a significant new step for OSI, who have not previously referred a matter to competition authorities. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Adam Thierer
Wow, what a year for cyberlaw and information technology policy books! [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  First: can defendants rely in support of a plea of fair comment on matters to which they made no reference in their comment? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
This was so, even where the subject matter was not within the public domain. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
This was so, even where the subject matter was not within the public domain. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
As a result, Lord Phillips re-wrote Lord Nicholls’ the fourth proposition to read: “.. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am by Adam Wagner
This was so, even where the subject matter was not within the public domain. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The House of Lords however, in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley, [2002] 2 AC 164, complicated matters. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:27 am
Link to an interview with Lucy Nichols of Nokia, on BBC Radio 4’s ‘You and Yours’ programme (click here and go to Chapter 2). [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
There has been a great deal of publicity about the need to reform the law of defamation. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
Bannerjee: “In my judgment, this case bears no resemblance to the cases that Lord Nicholls had in mind as exceptional. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:21 pm by William H. Holmes
" The CPUC was set to decide in October 2010 what restrictions it would place on the use of TRECs, but the Commission's consideration of the matter has now been postponed until December 2, 2010. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  The wise practitioner might well take the view that this is a matter best left to politicians and reformers and simply await the outcome. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The applicant accused his opponent of criminal libel, but the prosecutor’s office terminated the investigation on the ground that the flyer concerned the applicant as a candidate rather than as a public official and so its publication was not a matter for a public prosecution. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
The interpretation of fairness clearly lies within the eye of the beholder, as noted by Lord Nicholls in White v White [2000] UKHL 54 and this concept is where the case law will now develop. [read post]