Search for: "Matter of State of New York v John T." Results 461 - 480 of 1,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Kalven, Harry, The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment”, 1964 Sup. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
 In terms of furtherance of conservatives’ ideological agenda for constitutional jurisprudence, John Roberts’ NFIB opinion was an historic, landmark accomplishment. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
Hobbs, in which the Justices heard oral argument last week on whether state prison officials can prohibit a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard, matters. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
 Indeed, one New York decision has held that `if the person engaged in gambling is located in New York, then New York is the location where the gambling occurred. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
In November 2022, the New York Times reported that Bragg’s office had revived the hush money case. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
We don’t know what happened before August 13, 2013 on this matter, so there is much to be filled in on the earlier timeline. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that two cases pending in the Supreme Court, an abortion case and a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, and one likely on the way there, El Paso’s bid to stop construction of part of the border wall, show how “[t]he president’s lawyers have weaponized the doctrine of standing. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:56 pm
Dynex cites no authority in support of its requirement that plaintiffs must plead knowledge as to the person responsible for making the challenged statement, but it likely paraphrased this rule from a 2004 decision from the Southern District of New York, Kinsey v. [read post]