Search for: "Matter of Thomas J." Results 461 - 480 of 2,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2021, 4:54 pm by David Oscar Markus
Thomas, 116 F.3d 606, 611, 623–24 (2d Cir. 1997) (Cabranes, J.) [read post]
2 May 2021, 1:14 pm
After a jury then found for Google on fair use, the Federal Circuit reversed, concluding that Google’s copying was not a fair use as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm by Jamie Markham
’” Jones, slip op. at 9 (Sotomayor, J., dissenting). [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 7:50 am by Gene Takagi
(Timothy Bella, Washington Post) Getting Serious About Diversity: Enough Already with the Business Case (Robin J. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Thomas J says, “but, in assessing whether a company exercises substantial market power, what matters is whether the alternatives are comparable. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:59 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., Gonzales, 550 U.S. at 169 (Thomas, J., concurring); Stenberg, 530 U.S. at 956 (Scalia, J., dissenting); Casey, 505 U.S. at 952–53 (1992) (Rehnquist, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
”  (Slip op. at 1)  Instead, the majority held that even if the entire API was protected, Google’s use of the declaring code, defining the names of the methods and their organization into packages, classes, and methods, was fair: “where Google reimplemented a user interface, taking only what was needed to allow users to put their accrued talents to work in a new and transformative program, Google’s copying of the Sun Java API was a fair use of that material as a… [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 12:14 pm by Tia Sewell
CSIS experts Jacob Kurtzer and J. [read post]