Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 461 - 480 of 1,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 12:57 pm by Stefanie K. Vaudreuil
  The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on June 15, 2015, that an employee was lawfully terminated for testing positive for marijuana, but that case was brought under the theory of lawful off-duty conduct, not disability discrimination. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Early in the Internet Era (1992), the Supreme Court held, in Quill v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Early in the Internet Era (1992), the Supreme Court held, in Quill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
But now, there well may be a majority on the Supreme Court willing to overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:31 am by Steve Vladeck
Nelson and Madden present the question as a straightforward and classic procedural due process claim – focusing on why the Exoneration Act (the remedy the Colorado Supreme Court identified for individuals like Nelson and Madden) fails to satisfy the familiar three-part balancing test of Mathews v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
On Wednesday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Artis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Anderson, the Court has agreed to hear an appeal from the Colorado Supreme Court’s bombshell December 19, 2023 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 12:48 pm by Judy Selby
  Acknowledging that its decision was at odds with holdings of the 10th Circuit, the Colorado Supreme Court, and a New York appellate court, the court stated that its ruling was based on the “true intent of Congress in enacting the TCPA. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Erin Kristofco
In this regard, we agree with the Arizona Supreme Court's statement that “[w]hile it is clear that an insurer may defend a fairly debatable claim, all that means is that it may not defend one that is not fairly debatable. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:41 am by Ryke Longest
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two original jurisdiction disputes among states in which key federal water agencies are involved. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by Todd Henderson
It is unlikely that Ammon Bundy and friends, currently illegally occupying the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, planned their protest against federal land management policies in the West to coincide with the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 6:32 am by Robin Craig
Tennessee is not only the Supreme Court’s first oral argument of the 2021-22 term, but it is also the first time that states have asked the court to weigh in on how they should share an interstate aquifer. [read post]